There is a sad truth that not many teachers would
critically think about their teaching methods; exam systems; teaching materials;
and some very influential teaching pedagogies in a certain time, such as PPP;
CFL; even TBLT. As for me, I never doubt the importance of integrating English
language class with real-life tasks and never had I thought there should be anything
wrong to organize classroom activities until I had my first lesson in the third
year of university.
In the third year of university, I got a chance to have
an internship in a middle school, which is located at an outer suburb of a small
city in China. I felt extremely nervous before the first class. In order to impress
the students, I made teaching aids (pictures of animals) by myself. I prepared
many classroom activities for students, and even wrote down every single word
that I would say in the first lesson and recited very fluently(which is
ridiculous ). I thought I had prepared my lesson very well, however, the result
was not very satisfying. Many students stared at me with a confused look during
the lesson, and failed to answer most of the questions I asked. They were reluctant
to take part in those activities I designed.
I felt frustrated and asked the head teacher for help. After
talking to the head teacher, I realized English was not a compulsory subject in
the public primary schools in this area, and most of the students came from
peasant family so they could not have a chance and extra money to learn English
after school, so it was not surprised that they had little reaction towards
those activities.
Looking back this failure now, I realize this failure
could be prevented if I analyzed the context first. At that time, I forgot a
very important thing that teachers should not always focus on applying ‘the
best theory’ and follow the trends blindly. The theories of many famous
scholars are indeed advanced, but might not be proper in our own teaching
context. The theories are usually based on a visionary situation, in which
students are always obedient, and can understand every command of a teacher. However,
the real teaching situation can be like a jungle, teachers had better pray for
not getting lost because with little theoretical support they are on their own.
Thus, having awareness to think and teach language critically is of great
importance. Critical language teaching should involve critique. During the process
of critical thinking, the teaching ideas should be reasoned and well thought.
In conclusion, there is no answer of what the best
teaching pedagogy is. The angles of viewing the world and education have always
been changing along with the development of the world. The creation of new
things never stops, therefore, being a teacher, we should think critically
about the pedagogies we apply ; try our best to analyze students’ needs and
teaching context. That is to say, we should: stay open-minded; have experimental
spirit; never stop absorbing new knowledge; and reflect after teaching all the
time.
References:
Lin, A.M.Y. (1999). Doing-English-lessons in the
reproduction or transformation of social worlds? TESOL Quarterly, 33(3),
393-412.
Pennycook, A. (1999). Introduction: Critical approaches
to TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 33(3), 329-348.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.